CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Nesivos Hatalmud

Yeshiva school in the United States

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 17, 2026
Entity authoritySource title only
Source-derived summary

Mesivta Nesivos Hatalmud, is a Yeshiva based in the Borough Park area of Brooklyn, N.Y.

It was founded in 2005 by Rabbi Shmuel Mordechai Wolner, who currently serves as the Rosh Yeshiva.

In winter 2014, he established Yeshiva Gedolah Nesivos Hatalmud.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nesivos Hatalmud” as yeshiva school in the United States. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nesivos, Hatalmud and Yeshiva.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nesivos, Hatalmud and Yeshiva providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nesivos Hatalmud”, the useful work is to connect “yeshiva school in the United States” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 17, 2026. The first chronological checks are 2005 and 2014.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nesivos Hatalmud”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nesivos Hatalmud primary sources, Nesivos Hatalmud archive and Nesivos research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nesivos Hatalmud”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nesivos Hatalmud” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.