Neopetalia
species of dragonfly
Neopetalia is a monotypic genus of dragonflies and the only genus in the family Neopetaliidae, which is placed in the superfamily Cordulegastroidea. Its only species, Neopetalia punctata, commonly known as the spotwing, is endemic to Chile.
Neopetalia punctata inhabits cool temperate forests of south-central Chile, where its larvae develop in spring-fed seeps and small forest streams. Adults are large, robust dragonflies with broad wings marked with distinctive dark reddish-brown spots. The species is assessed as Data Deficient by the IUCN.
Description
The sole species, Neopetalia punctata, is a large, robust dragonfly with broad wings and a dark body marked with yellow. The wings have a series of dark reddish-brown spots along the leading edge, a characteristic shared with the related Australian members of the former Neopetaliidae.
Adults inhabit cool forest environments and spend much of their time flying beneath or above the forest canopy. Activity is greatest during sunny periods following cloud cover, while in prolonged sunshine adults often retreat into the canopy. At dawn and dusk they patrol along forest roads and streams a few metres above the ground.
The larvae inhabit spring-fed seeps, small forest streams and quiet silty pools, where they live partly buried in fine sediment as ambush predators.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Neopetalia” as species of dragonfly. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of dragonfly. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q141323. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Neopetalia”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Neopetalia primary sources, Neopetalia archive and Neopetalia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Neopetalia”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Neopetalia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.