Neo-medievalism
political order of a globalized world with complex, overlapping and incomplete sovereignties, analogous to high-medieval Europe

Neo-medievalism (or neomedievalism, new medievalism) is a term with a long history that has acquired specific technical senses in two branches of scholarship.
Neo-medievalism is a term used to describe modern situations that resemble certain aspects of the Middle Ages, especially when traditional political structures or cultural boundaries seem to break down or become less clear. The concept is often used to explain contemporary conditions—such as the weakening of nation-states, the rise of powerful non-state actors, or the blending of global cultures—that feel similar to the overlapping authorities and decentralized systems of medieval Europe. Outside of politics, the term also refers to the ways modern people reuse, reinterpret, or reinvent medieval ideas and imagery in literature, film, games, and other forms of popular culture. In this broader sense, neo-medievalism helps explain why medieval themes continue to thrive in the modern world and how they are reshaped to reflect today's concerns.
In political theory about modern international relations, the term is originally associated with Hedley Bull. Political theory sees the political order of a globalized world as analogous to high-medieval Europe, in which neither states, nor the Church, nor other territorial powers, exercised full sovereignty. Instead, the institutions participated in complex, overlapping, and incomplete sovereignties.
In literary theory regarding the use and abuse of texts and tropes from the Middle Ages in postmodernity, the term neomedieval was popularized by the Italian medievalist Umberto Eco in his 1983 essay "Dreaming of the Middle Ages".
Political theory
The idea of neomedievalism in political theory was first discussed in 1977 by theorist Hedley Bull in The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics to describe the erosion of state sovereignty in the contemporary globalized world:It is also conceivable that sovereign states might disappear and be replaced not by a world government but by a modern and secular equivalent of the kind of universal political organisation that existed in Western Christendom in the Middle Ages.
The public source identifies “Neo-medievalism” as political order of a globalized world with complex, overlapping and incomplete sovereignties, analogous to high-medieval Europe. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Neo-medievalism, political and order.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Neo-medievalism”, the useful work is to connect “political order of a globalized world with complex, overlapping and incomplete sovereignties, analogous to high-medieval Europe” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6991795. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983 and 1977.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Neo-medievalism”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Neo-medievalism primary sources, Neo-medievalism archive and Neo-medievalism research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Neo-medievalism”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Neo-medievalism” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.