CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Veaceslav Negruța

Moldovan economist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ3555156 ↗
Source-derived summary

Veaceslav Negruța (born 4 March 1972) is a Moldovan economist. He was the Minister of Finance (2009-2013) in the First Vlad Filat Cabinet and in the Second Filat Cabinet, and in the Leancă Cabinet as well.

Biography

Veaceslav Negruța was born on 4 March 1972, in Delacău, in the Grigoriopol District of the Moldovan SSR. He was a member of the Liberal Democratic Party of Moldova.

Editorial summary

“Veaceslav Negruța” enters the record as moldovan economist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Veaceslav, Negruța and Moldovan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 2009, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-03-04. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Veaceslav, Negruța and Moldovan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Veaceslav Negruța” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Veaceslav, Negruța and Moldovan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3555156. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972, 2009 and 2013.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Veaceslav Negruța”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Veaceslav Negruța primary sources, Veaceslav Negruța archive and Veaceslav research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Veaceslav Negruța”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Veaceslav Negruța” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.