CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Nderim Saraçi

chess player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ27531198 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nderim Saraçi (born 1996) is a Kosovan chess player.

Chess career

He was awarded the International master title in 2018 and the FIDE master title in 2016. He belongs to the SK 1912 Ludwigshafen club.

He won the open rapid Pristina chess tournament in 2019.

He drew 2nd- 4th place in the open rapid Adem Jashari chess tournament cup in 2019.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Nderim Saraçi” is chess player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nderim, Saraçi and chess, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 2018, 2016, 1912—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1996-09-16. For this dossier, Nderim, Saraçi and chess is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “chess player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27531198. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1996, 2018, 2016 and 1912.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nderim Saraçi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nderim Saraçi primary sources, Nderim Saraçi archive and Nderim research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nderim Saraçi”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nderim Saraçi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.