CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Natural bundle

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 15, 2025
Entity authorityQ36775500
Source-derived summary

In differential geometry, a field in mathematics, a natural bundle is any fiber bundle associated to the higher order frame bundle

F

r

(

M

)

{\displaystyle F^{r}(M)}

, for some

r

1

{\displaystyle r\geq 1}

. In other words, its transition functions depend functionally on local changes of coordinates in the base manifold

M

{\displaystyle M}

together with their partial derivatives up to order at most

r

{\displaystyle r}

.

The concept of a natural bundle was introduced in 1972 by Albert Nijenhuis as a modern reformulation of the classical concept of an arbitrary bundle of geometric objects.

Definition

Let

M

f

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}f}

denote the category of smooth manifolds and smooth maps and

M

f

n

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}f_{n}}

the category of smooth

n

{\displaystyle n}

-dimensional manifolds and local diffeomorphisms. Consider also the category

F

M

{\displaystyle {\mathcal {FM}}}

of fibred manifolds and bundle morphisms, and the functor

B

:

F

M

M

f

{\displaystyle B:{\mathcal {FM}}\to {\mathcal {M}}f}

associating to any fibred manifold its base manifold.

A natural bundle (or bundle functor) is a functor

F

:

M

f

n

F

M

{\displaystyle F:{\mathcal {M}}f_{n}\to {\mathcal {FM}}}

satisfying the following three properties:

B

F

=

i

d

{\displaystyle B\circ F=\mathrm {id} }

, i.e.

F

(

M

)

{\displaystyle F(M)}

is a fibred manifold over

M

{\displaystyle M}

, with projection denoted by

p

M

:

F

(

M

)

M

{\displaystyle p_{M}:F(M)\to M}

;

if

U

M

{\displaystyle U\subseteq M}

is an open submanifold, with inclusion map

i

:

U

M

{\displaystyle i:U\hookrightarrow M}

, then

F

(

U

)

{\displaystyle F(U)}

coincides with

p

M

1

(

U

)

F

(

M

)

{\displaystyle p_{M}^{-1}(U)\subseteq F(M)}

, and

F

(

i

)

:

F

(

U

)

F

(

M

)

{\displaystyle F(i):F(U)\to F(M)}

is the inclusion

p

1

(

U

)

F

(

M

)

{\displaystyle p^{-1}(U)\hookrightarrow F(M)}

;

for any smooth map

f

:

P

×

M

N

{\displaystyle f:P\times M\to N}

such that

f

(

p

,

)

:

M

N

{\displaystyle f(p,\cdot ):M\to N}

is a local diffeomorphism for every

p

P

{\displaystyle p\in P}

, then the function

P

×

F

(

M

)

F

(

N

)

,

(

p

,

x

)

F

(

f

(

p

,

)

)

(

x

)

{\displaystyle P\times F(M)\to F(N),(p,x)\mapsto F(f(p,\cdot ))(x)}

is smooth.

As a consequence of the first condition, one has a natural transformation

p

:

F

i

d

M

f

n

{\displaystyle p:F\to \mathrm {id} _{{\mathcal {M}}f_{n}}}

.

Finite order natural bundles

A natural bundle

F

:

M

f

n

F

M

{\displaystyle F:{\mathcal {M}}f_{n}\to {\mathcal {FM}}}

is called of finite order

r

{\displaystyle r}

if, for every local diffeomorphism

f

:

M

N

{\displaystyle f:M\to N}

and every point

x

M

{\displaystyle x\in M}

, the map

F

(

f

)

x

:

F

(

M

)

x

F

(

N

)

f

(

x

)

{\displaystyle F(f)_{x}:F(M)_{x}\to F(N)_{f(x)}}

depends only on the jet

j

x

r

f

{\displaystyle j_{x}^{r}f}

. Equivalently, for every local diffeomorphisms

f

,

g

:

M

N

{\displaystyle f,g:M\to N}

and every point

x

M

{\displaystyle x\in M}

, one has

j

x

r

f

=

j

x

r

g

F

(

f

)

|

F

(

M

)

x

=

F

(

g

)

|

F

(

M

)

x

.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Natural bundle” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Natural, bundle and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Natural, bundle and Open-knowledge is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 15, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q36775500. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1972.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Natural bundle”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Natural bundle primary sources, Natural bundle archive and Natural research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Natural bundle”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Natural bundle” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.