CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

National Women's Law Center

nonprofit organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ6979439 ↗
Source-derived summary

The National Women's Law Center (NWLC) is a United States non-profit organization founded by Marcia Greenberger in 1972 and based in Washington, D.C. The Center advocates for women's rights, LGBTQ equity and inclusion through litigation, policy, and culture-change initiatives.

The NWLC created and administers the TIME'S UP Legal Defense Fund, which provides legal and public relations support to individuals who have been subject to sexual harassment and assault in the workplace.

History

The National Women's Law Center originated after administrative staff and law students employed with the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP) asked for higher pay, an increase in the number of women being employed as lawyers, the formation of a formal women's program, and an end to the assumption that they'd serve coffee every morning.

CLASP subsequently established the Women's Rights Project in 1972 hiring attorney Marcia Greenberger to formalize the new program. She was joined by Nancy Duff Campbell in 1978, and the two of them chose to go to battle against a standard policy among American businesses: depriving pregnant women access to disability coverage. Their efforts fighting this flawed procedure led to federal passage in 1978 of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act that amended Title IX of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

In 1981, the co-directors decided to rename the program the National Women's Law Center and set its direction toward equity and inclusion. They stepped down as co-presidents July 1, 2017, and NWLC named Fatima Goss Graves to succeed them as the new President and CEO.

Campaigns

The National Women's Law Center filed an amicus curiae brief in the 1996 Supreme Court case United States v. Virginia, which concerned the male-only admission policy of the Virginia Military Institute.

Today, the NWLC focuses on child care, early learning, education and Title IX, health care, reproductive rights, courts and judges, LGBTQ equality, military, poverty, economic security, racial and ethnic justice, taxation, budgets and workplace justice.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “National Women's Law Center” as nonprofit organization. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around National, Women's and Center.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 1978, 1964, 1981—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with National, Women's and Center providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “National Women's Law Center”, the useful work is to connect “nonprofit organization” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6979439. VIAF identifies the subject as 153308197. The Library of Congress control number is n83190712. 3 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972, 1978, 1964 and 1981.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “National Women's Law Center”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow National Women's Law Center primary sources, National Women's Law Center archive and National research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “National Women's Law Center”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “National Women's Law Center” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.