CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

National Government (1935–1937)

3rd National Government of the United Kingdom

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ7784906 ↗
Source-derived summary

The National Government of 1935–1937 was formed by Stanley Baldwin on his reappointment as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom by King George V, following the resignation of Ramsay MacDonald in June 1935.

As a National Government it was a coalition of members of the Conservative Party, Liberal Nationals and National Labour, as well as a number of individuals who belonged to no political party. The Government oversaw the Edward VIII abdication crisis and three monarchs in 1936. In May 1937, Baldwin retired and was replaced as prime minister by Neville Chamberlain.

Cabinet

1935–1937

Notes

Anthony Eden served as Minister without Portfolio, with specific responsibility for League of Nations Affairs (and was often referred to as "Minister for League of Nations Affairs) for approximately six months; during this time, he enjoyed equal status with the Foreign Secretary (Sir Samuel Hoare) and sat in the cabinet.

List of ministers

Members of the Cabinet are in bold face.

References

Butler, David, and G. Butler, Twentieth Century British Political Facts 1900–2000

Hyde, H. Montgomery. Baldwin: The Unexpected Prime Minister (1973)

Jenkins, Roy. Baldwin (1987) excerpt and text search

Mowat, Charles Loch. Britain Between the Wars, 1918–1940 (1955).

Editorial summary

“National Government (1935–1937)” enters the record as 3rd National Government of the United Kingdom. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what National, Government and United can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1935, 1937, 1936, 1900—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around National, Government and United.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“National Government (1935–1937)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, National, Government and United provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7784906. The first chronological checks are 1935, 1937, 1936 and 1900.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “National Government (1935–1937)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow National Government (1935–1937) primary sources, National Government (1935–1937) archive and National research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “National Government (1935–1937)”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “National Government (1935–1937)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.