CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nathrenus

subgenus of insects

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ21230983
Source-derived summary

Nathrenus is a subgenus of the genus Anthrenus of the subfamily Megatominae within the family of skin beetles. The most well-known species from the subgenus, varied carpet beetle (Anthrenus verbasci), is distributed in most parts of the world, whereas the vast majority of other species are only present in regions of Africa and Asia.

Key characters

Subgenus is distinguished by antennae with 11 segments. Occasionally, male specimen appear with 10 antennae segments, having one less "filler" segment in the middle. Inner edge of eye doesn't have indentation, as opposed to subgenus Anthrenus.

Species

According to World Dermestidae catalogue, these species currently belong to subgenus Nathrenus:

Species group "albomaculatus"

Species group "verbasci"

Species group "ambericus" (extinct)

Some species of subgenus Nathrenus were preserved in amber and consist of:

†Anthrenus ambericus (Háva, Prokop & Herrmann, 2006)

†Anthrenus electron (Háva, Prokop & Kadej, 2006)

†Anthrenus groehni (Háva, Prokop & Herrmann, 2006)

†Anthrenus kerneggeri (Háva, Prokop & Herrmann, 2008)

Synonymization of Neoanthrenus

In 2013, researchers reclassified the species of the endemic Australian genus Neoanthrenus, placing them under the subgenus Nathrenus (as a group of species "ocellifer"). However, recent research removes the species from genus Anthrenus due to significant genetic and morphological differences.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nathrenus” as subgenus of insects. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nathrenus, subgenus and insects.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2008, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nathrenus, subgenus and insects providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nathrenus”, the useful work is to connect “subgenus of insects” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21230983. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2008 and 2013.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nathrenus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nathrenus primary sources, Nathrenus archive and Nathrenus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nathrenus”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nathrenus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.