CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Narupon Wild

Thai association football player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ21181017 ↗
Source-derived summary

Narupon Wild (Thai: นฤพน ไวลด์, born July 21, 1988), simply known as Nazza (Thai: น๊าซซ่า), is a Thai former professional footballer who plays as a midfielder.

Club career

Nazza was born on the small island of Koh Samet in Thailand, and spent much of his childhood moving internationally.

He was primarily educated in the Dutch youth football system at AFC Amsterdam and in the English youth system at The New Saints F.C. After being offered a full scholarship to the Florida Institute of Technology, he again explored another part of the world playing for the Florida Tech Panthers. After graduating with a bachelor's degree in Business Administration, he returned to the Netherlands on trial at FC Volendam in the Jupiler League before signing a short-term contract with AGOVV Apeldoorn.

His first professional contract was with Bangkok United in the Thai 1st divisions. He helps them get a promotion to the Thai Premier League in his first year. 3 years later he joined BBCU F.C. and also helped them get promoted to the Thai Premier League while also being captain. After 2 successful season, Buriram United signed Nazza to a 3-year contract in 2016. He became a Thai Premier League Champion in 2017 and was then purchased by his current club Suphanburi FC in 2018.

Editorial summary

“Narupon Wild” enters the record as thai association football player. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Narupon, Wild and Thai can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1988, 2016, 2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1988-07-21, 1988-06-18—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Narupon, Wild and Thai.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Narupon Wild” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Narupon, Wild and Thai provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21181017. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1988, 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Narupon Wild”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Narupon Wild primary sources, Narupon Wild archive and Narupon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Narupon Wild”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Narupon Wild” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.