CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Narcissus longispathus

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ1336160
Source-derived summary

Narcissus longispathus is a species of bulbous plant that is endemic to Spain. Its natural habitat is rivers. It is threatened by habitat loss. This distinctive daffodil species grows in permanently damp meadows and spring-fed stream banks in mountainous areas of Andalusia. Despite surviving in only ten subpopulations across several mountain ranges, it maintains high genetic diversity, with most variation occurring within rather than between populations.

Genetic diversity and population structure

Allozyme analyses across 27 populations of the daffodil have revealed surprisingly high genetic variation for a species confined to a few fragmented mountain habitats. By screening enzyme variants (allozymes) at 19 gene-loci in 858 plants, researchers found that 68 % of loci were polymorphic—that is, they existed in more than one form—and that, on average, there were 2.1 alleles per locus. Although some small or isolated populations showed modest reductions in allelic richness, most genetic diversity (roughly 84 %) was maintained within individual populations rather than between them. Observed levels of heterozygosity (the proportion of individuals carrying two different alleles at a locus) were only slightly lower than expected under random mating, indicating little inbreeding despite the species' patchy distribution.

Spatial analyses uncovered a clear pattern of isolation by distance operating over very short ranges.

Editorial summary

“Narcissus longispathus” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Narcissus, longispathus and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 206-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Narcissus, longispathus and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Narcissus longispathus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Narcissus, longispathus and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1336160. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Narcissus longispathus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Narcissus longispathus primary sources, Narcissus longispathus archive and Narcissus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Narcissus longispathus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Narcissus longispathus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.