Nama Peak
Open-knowledge reference entry
Nama Peak, or Mount Nama, is a 5,588 metre side peak about 8 km to the west-northwest of the main summit of Minya Konka, the highest mountain of the Daxue Mountains, itself a part of the Hengduan Mountains.
The peak lies within Kangding city. The whole mountain is under the administration of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan, China, being about 250 km from the provincial capital of Chengdu.
Climbing
Nama Peak was first climbed by a German couple in late April 2001. Not long ago, it did not have an official name. Only in recent years, due to its relative ease and clear view of the 3,000 m high west face of Mt. Gongga, the ascent has now become a popular destination for amateur climbers. Climbing season is from April to June, and from September to November.
From Chengdu (430 m altitude), the drive to Caoke Township (1,500 m) takes about five hours. Subsequent rides and short hikes reach Lower Zimei village (3,500 m).
The public source identifies “Nama Peak” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nama, Peak and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nama Peak”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137187262. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Nama Peak”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Nama Peak primary sources, Nama Peak archive and Nama research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nama Peak”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Nama Peak” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.