Nage-no-kata
Martial arts forms/techniques

Nage-no-kata (Japanese: 投の形; "forms of throwing") is one of the two randori-no-kata (乱取りの形; free practice forms) of Kodokan Judo. It is intended as an illustration of the various concepts of nage-waza (投げ技; throwing techniques) that exist in judo, and is used both as a training method and as a demonstration of understanding.
History
The nage-no-kata was developed by Jigoro Kano as a method of illustrating principles of throwing to allow students to more effectively apply them in randori. Initially the kata consisted of ten techniques. These were subsequently appended with the addition of a further five throws, including kata guruma and uki otoshi.
Description
The kata is composed of 3 techniques each from the five classifications of throw in judo:
Te-waza (手技; hand techniques)
Koshi-waza (腰技; hip techniques)
Ashi-waza (足技; foot techniques)
Ma-sutemi-waza (真捨身技; rear sacrifice techniques)
Yoko-sutemi-waza (橫捨身技; side sacrifice techniques)
Each of these 15 techniques is performed twice in the specified order, both right and left handed. The kata is generally performed in a strictly formalised manner with clearly defined Reigi sahō (礼儀作法; rules of etiquette).
Aisatsu (挨拶; Salutation)
Tori (取り; the executor of the techniques in the kata) and Uke (受け, the receiver) approach the mat from opposite sides, with Tori on the left hand of the Joseki (上座; high point of the dojo) and Uke on the right (i.e. as they would be if facing towards the Joseki). They bow as they step on the mat, then turn to face the Joseki and execute a ritsu rei (立礼; standing bow), then turn to face each other and execute a zarei (座礼; kneeling bow).
“Nage-no-kata” enters the record as martial arts forms/techniques. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nage-no-kata, Martial and arts can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Nage-no-kata” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nage-no-kata, Martial and arts provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 26, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1735521. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Nage-no-kata”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Nage-no-kata primary sources, Nage-no-kata archive and Nage-no-kata research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nage-no-kata”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Nage-no-kata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.