Nagata's conjecture
certain automorphism of the polynomial ring k[x,y,z] is wild

In algebra, Nagata's conjecture states that Nagata's automorphism of the polynomial ring k[x,y,z] is wild. The conjecture was proposed by Nagata (1972) and proved by Ualbai U. Umirbaev and Ivan P. Shestakov (2004).
Nagata's automorphism is given by
ϕ
(
x
,
y
,
z
)
=
(
x
−
2
Δ
y
−
Δ
2
z
,
y
+
Δ
z
,
z
)
,
{\displaystyle \phi (x,y,z)=(x-2\Delta y-\Delta ^{2}z,y+\Delta z,z),}
where
Δ
=
x
z
+
y
2
{\displaystyle \Delta =xz+y^{2}}
.
For the inverse, let
(
a
,
b
,
c
)
=
ϕ
(
x
,
y
,
z
)
{\displaystyle (a,b,c)=\phi (x,y,z)}
Then
z
=
c
{\displaystyle z=c}
and
Δ
=
b
2
+
a
c
{\displaystyle \Delta =b^{2}+ac}
.
With this
y
=
b
−
Δ
c
{\displaystyle y=b-\Delta c}
and
x
=
a
+
2
Δ
y
+
Δ
2
z
{\displaystyle x=a+2\Delta y+\Delta ^{2}z}
.
References
Nagata, Masayoshi (1972), On automorphism group of k[x,y], Tokyo: Kinokuniya Book-Store Co.
“Nagata's conjecture” enters the record as certain automorphism of the polynomial ring k[x,y,z] is wild. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nagata's, conjecture and certain can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Nagata's conjecture” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nagata's, conjecture and certain provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6958656. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1972 and 2004.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Nagata's conjecture”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Nagata's conjecture primary sources, Nagata's conjecture archive and Nagata's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nagata's conjecture”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Nagata's conjecture” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.