CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nael Roux

French Polynesian swimmer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ123553167
Source-derived summary

Nael Roux (born 2005 or 2006) is a French Polynesian swimmer who has represented French Polynesia at the Pacific Games.

In October 2023 he set a record in the Tahiti to Moorea ocean swimming race.

At the 2023 Pacific Games in Honiara he won gold in the 1500 meters freestyle, 400 meters medley, and 5 km open water, silver in the 400 meters freestyle, 4 x 200 meters freestyle relay, and 200 meters butterfly, and bronze in the 200 meters breaststroke.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nael Roux” as french Polynesian swimmer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nael, Roux and French.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2006, 2023, 1500—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nael, Roux and French providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nael Roux”, the useful work is to connect “french Polynesian swimmer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q123553167. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2006, 2023 and 1500.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nael Roux”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nael Roux primary sources, Nael Roux archive and Nael research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nael Roux”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nael Roux” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.