CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Nae-Simion Pleșca

member of the Moldovan Parliament

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ6958064 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nae-Simion Pleşca (born 13 September 1955 or 1957) is a politician from Moldova. He has been a member of the Parliament of Moldova since 2010.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nae-Simion Pleșca” as member of the Moldovan Parliament. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nae-Simion, Pleșca and member.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1955, 1957, 2010—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1957-09-13, 1955—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nae-Simion, Pleșca and member providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nae-Simion Pleșca”, the useful work is to connect “member of the Moldovan Parliament” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6958064. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1955, 1957 and 2010.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nae-Simion Pleșca”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nae-Simion Pleșca primary sources, Nae-Simion Pleșca archive and Nae-Simion research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nae-Simion Pleșca”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nae-Simion Pleșca” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.