CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Nacanieli Qerewaqa

Fijian judoka

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ6957072 ↗
Source-derived summary

Nacanieli Qerewaqa Takayawa (born 4 October 1975) is a Fijian judoka.

He won gold in the men's heavyweight event at the 2002 Commonwealth Games in Manchester. Qerewaqa also competed at the 1992, 1996 and 2000 Summer Olympics.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Nacanieli Qerewaqa” as fijian judoka. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Nacanieli, Qerewaqa and Fijian.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975, 2002, 1992, 1996—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1975-10-04. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Nacanieli, Qerewaqa and Fijian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Nacanieli Qerewaqa”, the useful work is to connect “fijian judoka” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6957072. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1975, 2002, 1992 and 1996.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nacanieli Qerewaqa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nacanieli Qerewaqa primary sources, Nacanieli Qerewaqa archive and Nacanieli research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nacanieli Qerewaqa”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Nacanieli Qerewaqa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.