CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Na Smenu!

soviet and Russian student newspaper

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ16679214
Source-derived summary

Na Smenu! (Russian: На смену!) was a Soviet and Russian student newspaper published from 1921 to 2009 (with a break in the 1940s). The publication was based in Yekaterinburg.

In the 1920s Na Smenu! was associated with the local group of proletarian writers of the same name, who the newspaper editors consulted with. The publication led the extremely aggressive propaganda of atheism and communism. In 1929-1930 the writers group has been "purged from unwelcome elements". The newspaper welcomed industrialization and participated in the organization of socialist emulations.

After the Great Patriotic War (1941–1945) became the exemplary Komsomol publication. Student of journalism had their internships there.

Editorial summary

“Na Smenu!” enters the record as soviet and Russian student newspaper. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Smenu, soviet and Russian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1921, 2009, 1929, 1930—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Smenu, soviet and Russian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Na Smenu!” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Smenu, soviet and Russian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16679214. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1921, 2009, 1929 and 1930.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Na Smenu!”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Na Smenu! primary sources, Na Smenu! archive and Smenu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Na Smenu!”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Na Smenu!” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.