NSSF Mbarara Complex
Ugandan office complex
NSSF Mbarara Complex, also Mbarara City House, is a building in Mbarara, a city in the Western Region of Uganda.
The building is owned by the Uganda National Social Security Fund, the largest pension fund in the countries of the East African Community, with assets of nearly USh10 trillion (approx. US$2.6 billion), as of June 2018.
Location
The building is located in the central business district of the city of Mbarara, in Mbarara District, about 268 kilometres (167 mi), by road, southwest of Kampala, Uganda's capital and largest city. The geographical coordinates of the building are 0°36'36.0"S 30°39'35.0"E (Latitude:-0.610000; Longitude:30.659722).
Overview
Mbarara City House is owned by the Uganda National Social Security Fund (NSSF), who developed the building, between 2017 and 2019. The building houses the NSSF offices in Mbarara and the remaining space is rented out to qualified commercial entities. The mixed use building consists of 1,500 square metres (16,146 sq ft) on four floors. The complex has surface parking for 40 vehicles.
History
Mbarara City House, is the second NSSF real estate investment outside the capital city of Kampala.
“NSSF Mbarara Complex” enters the record as ugandan office complex. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what NSSF, Mbarara and Complex can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“NSSF Mbarara Complex” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, NSSF, Mbarara and Complex provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65052298. Authority coordinates are -0.610, 30.660. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2018, 2017 and 2019.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “NSSF Mbarara Complex”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow NSSF Mbarara Complex primary sources, NSSF Mbarara Complex archive and NSSF research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “NSSF Mbarara Complex”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “NSSF Mbarara Complex” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.