GreenStreet
commercial development in Texas, United States
GreenStreet, formerly known as Houston Pavilions, is a commercial development in Downtown Houston, Texas, United States.
The Houston Chronicle reported that the Pavilions will provide around 1,800 to 2,000 full- and part-time jobs.
The Houston Pavilions office tower, which is 11 stories tall, is named the NRG Tower, after its main tenant.
History
Planning
Construction was scheduled to begin in Spring 2006, with the first developments opening in the fourth quarter of 2007. The project possesses an estimated cost of $200 million and is expected to contain almost 560,000 square feet (50,000 m2) of space, including 360,000 square feet (33,000 m2) of retail space in the first two levels of the development. The project covers three 1.4-acre (5,700 m2) city blocks. As of November 16, 2006, 50% of the retail space had been leased. 200,000 square feet (19,000 m2) of loft office space will be available on the mid-block between Fannin and San Jacinto Streets. Office parking will be provided in the Houston Pavilions' 1,675 garage located on the corner of Main and Polk.
The project was developed by Texas Real Estate Trust, Inc.
The public source identifies “GreenStreet” as commercial development in Texas, United States. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around GreenStreet, commercial and development.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “GreenStreet”, the useful work is to connect “commercial development in Texas, United States” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12059093. Authority coordinates are 29.754, -95.365. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2007.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “GreenStreet”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow GreenStreet primary sources, GreenStreet archive and GreenStreet research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “GreenStreet”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “GreenStreet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.