CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

DOI-NDEPA

pharmaceutical compound

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ135428011 ↗
Source-derived summary

DOI-NDEPA is a chemical compound of the phenethylamine, DOx, and NDEPA families. It is the N-(N,N-diethylpropylamide) (NDEPA) derivative of the psychedelic drug DOI. The drug can also be thought of as a derivative of DOI with an LSD-like N,N-diethylamide moiety. A quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) predicted that DOI-NDEPA would bind with high affinity to the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. Its predicted affinity (Ki) was 3.2 nM. DOI-NDEPA was first described in the scientific literature by 1999.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “DOI-NDEPA” as pharmaceutical compound. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where DOI-NDEPA, pharmaceutical and compound can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as pharmaceutical compound. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q135428011. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “DOI-NDEPA”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow DOI-NDEPA primary sources, DOI-NDEPA archive and DOI-NDEPA research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “DOI-NDEPA”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “DOI-NDEPA” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.