Pacific Office Automation 147
NASCAR Xfinity Series race at Portland International Raceway
The Pacific Office Automation 147 was a NASCAR Xfinity Series race that was held at the Portland International Raceway road course in Portland, Oregon. Connor Zilisch was the final winner of the event.
History
A NASCAR Camping World Truck Series race was previously held at this track in 1999 and 2000. The Xfinity Series race at Portland marked the first time since then that a NASCAR national series has had a race in the Pacific Northwest.
On September 18, 2021, Elizabeth Blackstock from Jalopnik reported that there were rumors of the track hosting an Xfinity Series race and a Truck Series race in 2022. On September 25, Jordan Bianchi from The Athletic reported that Portland would likely be on the 2022 Xfinity Series schedule. The schedule was released on September 29 with Portland on Saturday, June 4. It replaced the race at the Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course. Both the Mid-Ohio and Portland races were promoted Green Savoree Racing Promotions. Mid-Ohio was given a Truck Series race after losing their Xfinity Series date.
The public source identifies “Pacific Office Automation 147” as nASCAR Xfinity Series race at Portland International Raceway. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Pacific, Office and Automation.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Pacific Office Automation 147”, the useful work is to connect “nASCAR Xfinity Series race at Portland International Raceway” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q111169988. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999, 2000, 2021 and 2022.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Pacific Office Automation 147”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Pacific Office Automation 147 primary sources, Pacific Office Automation 147 archive and Pacific research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pacific Office Automation 147”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Pacific Office Automation 147” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.