CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Coalition of Peaks

Representative body of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled peak organizations

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ100795396
Source-derived summary

The Coalition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peak Bodies, usually known as the Coalition of Peaks is an Australian peak body whose members comprise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled organisations. Its main purpose is to negotiate with the various Australian governments (Commonwealth and state and territory) regarding a national agreement on the Closing the Gap framework. Closing the Gap is a government strategy that aims to reduce disparity between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous Australians on key health, education, and economic opportunity targets.

It was formed in 2018, driven largely by the National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (NACCHO).

Background and history

In 2008, the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) made a commitment to work together to reduce the disparity between outcomes in areas such as life expectancy, health, education, and imprisonment, for non-Indigenous Australians compared with Indigenous Australians. The National Indigenous Reform Agreement (NIRA) included a strategy called "Closing the Gap", which laid out targets in reducing inequalities in these areas. This framework included plans for new programs and services, stronger reporting requirements, and a process by which progress on the targets could be measured. Some Indigenous people were involved in the development of the strategy, but it was mostly done by governments. Progress on achieving the targets was slow, for various reasons which included inadequate community involvement. In 2016, 14 community-controlled peak organisations wrote to Prime Minister Morrison, state premiers, and chief ministers to ask that the Council of Australian Governments (COAG; later National Cabinet) not make further changes to Closing the Gap without Indigenous communities providing support as well as being able to provide input in a formal and ongoing role.

Editorial summary

“Coalition of Peaks” enters the record as representative body of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community controlled peak organizations. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Coalition, Peaks and Representative can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2018, 2008, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2019-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Coalition, Peaks and Representative.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Coalition of Peaks” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Coalition, Peaks and Representative provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q100795396. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2018, 2008 and 2016.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Coalition of Peaks”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Coalition of Peaks primary sources, Coalition of Peaks archive and Coalition research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Coalition of Peaks”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Coalition of Peaks” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.