NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I
constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise
NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I (این اے-68 منڈی بہاؤدین-۱) is a constituency for the National Assembly of Pakistan.
Members of Parliament
2018–2023: NA-85 Mandi Bahauddin-I
2024–present: NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I
Election 2002
General elections were held on 10 October 2002. Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry of PML-Q won by 70,675 votes.
Election 2008
General elections were held on 18 February 2008. Muhammad Tariq Tarar of PPP won by 73,981 votes.
Election 2013
General elections were held on 11 May 2013. Muhammad Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhary (independent) won by 85,009 votes and became the member of National Assembly.
Ijaz Chaudhary left his National Assembly seat and joined PTI on 29 November 2014.
He was disqualified in fake degree case by the Supreme Court of Pakistan on 14 April 2015.
By-election 2015
By elections were held on 8 June 2015 and Mumtaz Ahmed Tarar of PML-N won the slot with 70,638 votes.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I” is constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through NA-68, Mandi and Bahauddin-I, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q58401184. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 2023, 2024 and 2002.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I primary sources, NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I archive and NA-68 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “NA-68 Mandi Bahauddin-I” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.