NA-109 Jhang-II
constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise
NA-109 Jhang-II (این اے-109، جھنگ-2) is a constituency for the National Assembly of Pakistan. It is based on the old NA-89 with the main difference being the transfer of the town of Bagh to the new NA-116 and the inclusion of Jhang No. 2 from the old NA-87.
Members of Parliament
2018–2023: NA-115 Jhang-II
2024–present: NA-109 Jhang-II
Election 2002
General elections were held on 10 October 2002. Maulana Muhammad Azam Tariq an Independent candidate won by 41,425 votes.
Election 2008
General elections were held on 18 February 2008. Sheikh Waqas Akram of PML-Q won by 51,976 votes.
Election 2013
General elections were held on 11 May 2013. Sheikh Muhammad Akram of PML-N won by 74,324 votes and became the member of National Assembly. However an Election tribunal on 4 April 2014 disqualified him on the charges of bogus voting and bank loan default, and named the runner up Maulana Mohammad Ahmed Ludhianvi of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat as the winner.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “NA-109 Jhang-II” as constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as constituency of the National Assembly of Pakistan created in the 2018 delimitation exercise. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q58401282. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 2023, 2024 and 2002.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “NA-109 Jhang-II”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow NA-109 Jhang-II primary sources, NA-109 Jhang-II archive and NA-109 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “NA-109 Jhang-II”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “NA-109 Jhang-II” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.