CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mālpils Parish

parish in Sigulda Municipality, Latvia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ110446036 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mālpils Parish (Latvian: Mālpils pagasts) is an administrative unit of Sigulda Municipality in the Vidzeme region of Latvia. From 2009 to 2021 it was a separate municipality – Mālpils Municipality. The administrative centre is Mālpils.

The last Council Chair of Mālpils Municipality was Solvita Strausa from the United for Mālpils list.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Mālpils Parish” is parish in Sigulda Municipality, Latvia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Mālpils, Parish and parish, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Mālpils, Parish and parish is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “parish in Sigulda Municipality, Latvia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q110446036. Authority coordinates are 57.011, 24.960. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009 and 2021.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mālpils Parish”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mālpils Parish primary sources, Mālpils Parish archive and Mālpils research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mālpils Parish”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mālpils Parish” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.