CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

MyDirtyHobby

camming website

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ19365327
Source-derived summary

MyDirtyHobby is a website owned by Aylo focused on amateur pornography providing videos, photos and webcam shows.

Concept

MyDirtyHobby allows both users and performers to interact with each other through private messages and instant messaging.

The performers on mydirtyhobby.com are mostly amateur models and cam girls. However, there are also some porn stars to be found, such as Vivian Schmitt and Emma Starr.

As of September 2015, over 370,000 videos and 3.8 million pictures uploaded on the website by more than 40,000 amateur performers.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “MyDirtyHobby” is camming website. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through MyDirtyHobby, camming and website, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2006-01-01. For this dossier, MyDirtyHobby, camming and website is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “camming website” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19365327. 2 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 5 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “MyDirtyHobby”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow MyDirtyHobby primary sources, MyDirtyHobby archive and MyDirtyHobby research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “MyDirtyHobby”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from MyDirtyHobby” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.