CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Mustikuntla

village in Telangana, India

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 8, 2021
Entity authorityQ6943498 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mustikuntla is the largest village in Bonakal (Mandal) in Khammam district, in Telangana, India. It has a post office, several schools and a veterinary hospital. It has a stage which has been used for cultural programs like dramas, natikas used Ravicheetu Bazar. The death rate for 2009 was 6.54. Sarpanch was elected in 2014; he is from Mustikuntla village, Kommu.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mustikuntla” as village in Telangana, India. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mustikuntla, village and Telangana.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mustikuntla, village and Telangana providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mustikuntla”, the useful work is to connect “village in Telangana, India” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 8, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q6943498. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009 and 2014.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mustikuntla”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mustikuntla primary sources, Mustikuntla archive and Mustikuntla research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mustikuntla”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mustikuntla” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.