Muru Nyingba Monastery
building in Muru Nyingba Monastery, China
Muru Ningba or Meru Nyingba (rMe ru snying pa) (Tibetan: རྨེ་རུ་སྙིང་པ་) is a small Buddhist monastery located between the larger monasteries of Jokhang and Barkhor in the city of Lhasa, Tibet, China. It was the Lhasa seat of the former State Oracle who had his main residence at Nechung Monastery.
It is located immediately behind and east of the Jokhang and may be accessed from the north side of the Barkhor.
History
It is said that Emperor Songtsen Gampo built the first building here and it is where the great Tibetan scholar, Thonmi Sambhota, completed his work developing the Tibetan alphabet in the first half of the 7th century.
The present building, first constructed during the reign of King Ralpachen (c. 806-838 CE), is built like an Indian vihara around a courtyard, with the lhakang ('temple', literally 'residence of the deity') to the north and monks quarters on the three other sides. At that time, the Nyingma school was the sole Tibetan Buddhist school.
The building was destroyed during the persecution of Buddhism under Langdarma (c. 838 to 841 CE), but it was rebuilt by Atisha (980-1054 CE). In the 16th century, the monastery was incorporated into the Gelug school under Sonam Gyatso, the 3rd Dalai Lama (1543–1589).
“Muru Nyingba Monastery” enters the record as building in Muru Nyingba Monastery, China. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Muru, Nyingba and Monastery can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Muru Nyingba Monastery” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Muru, Nyingba and Monastery provides the most credible route into that argument.
The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1941681. Authority coordinates are 29.653, 91.133. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1054, 1543 and 1589.
Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.
- Historic place names
- Jurisdictional context
- Routes into maps and plans
Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Muru Nyingba Monastery”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Muru Nyingba Monastery primary sources, Muru Nyingba Monastery archive and Muru research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Muru Nyingba Monastery”?
- Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
- What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Muru Nyingba Monastery” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.