Murder of Ankita Bhandari
2022 murder in India

Ankita Bhandari (11 November 2003 – 18 September 2022) was an Indian receptionist from Pauri who was murdered at the Vanantra Resort by its owner, Pulkit Arya, the son of senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Vinod Arya, in Ganga-Bhogpur in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand.
Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) Renu Bisht, also a member of the BJP, has been accused of attempting to destroy evidence by ordering an unlawful demolition of the resort after the murder.
The case gained much publicity in national and state media due to the use of political power in an attempt at rape by coercion. This theory is supported by statements of the victim's mother, though the evidence presented in the charge sheet were deemed insufficient. According to the witness statement of a hotel staffer, she was raped.
Three main accused which included Pulkit Arya, the assistant resort manager, Ankit Gupta, and the resort manager, Saurabh Bhaskar, have confessed to the murder and were sentenced on charges of abduction and murder. A district court in Kotdwar convicted Arya, Gupta, and Bhaskar for the murder of Bhandari on 30 May 2025, with the verdict being delivered by Judge Reena Negi.
Background
Bhandari was born in the village of Dobh-Srikot, district Pauri, Uttarakhand. In 2021, Bhandari enrolled in a certificate course at Dehradun's Shri Ram Institute of Hotel Management. However, her father, Birendra Singh, soon lost his job as a security guard, forcing her to drop out of the one-year course.
The public source identifies “Murder of Ankita Bhandari” as 2022 murder in India. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Murder, Ankita and Bhandari.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Murder of Ankita Bhandari”, the useful work is to connect “2022 murder in India” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116687309. Authority coordinates are 29.974, 78.296. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2003, 2022, 2025 and 2021.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Murder of Ankita Bhandari”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Murder of Ankita Bhandari primary sources, Murder of Ankita Bhandari archive and Murder research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Murder of Ankita Bhandari”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Murder of Ankita Bhandari” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.