CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Multiplicity-one theorem

Concerns the representation theory of an adelic reductive algebraic group.

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 27, 2024
Entity authorityQ6935007
Source-derived summary

In the mathematical theory of automorphic representations, a multiplicity-one theorem is a result about the representation theory of an adelic reductive algebraic group. The multiplicity in question is the number of times a given abstract group representation is realised in a certain space, of square-integrable functions, given in a concrete way.

A multiplicity one theorem may also refer to a result about the restriction of a representation of a group G to a subgroup H. In that context, the pair (G, H) is called a strong Gelfand pair.

Definition

Let G be a reductive algebraic group over a number field K and let A denote the adeles of K. Let Z denote the centre of G and let ω be a continuous unitary character from Z(K)\Z(A)× to C×. Let L20(G(K)/G(A), ω) denote the space of cusp forms with central character ω on G(A). This space decomposes into a direct sum of Hilbert spaces

L

0

2

(

G

(

K

)

G

(

A

)

,

ω

)

=

^

(

π

,

V

π

)

m

π

V

π

{\displaystyle L_{0}^{2}(G(K)\backslash G(\mathbf {A} ),\omega )={\widehat {\bigoplus }}_{(\pi ,V_{\pi })}m_{\pi }V_{\pi }}

where the sum is over irreducible subrepresentations and mπ are non-negative integers.

The group of adelic points of G, G(A), is said to satisfy the multiplicity-one property if any smooth irreducible admissible representation of G(A) occurs with multiplicity at most one in the space of cusp forms of central character ω, i.e. mπ is 0 or 1 for all such π.

Results

The fact that the general linear group, GL(n), has the multiplicity-one property was proved by Jacquet & Langlands (1970) for n = 2 and independently by Piatetski-Shapiro (1979) and Shalika (1974) for n > 2 using the uniqueness of the Whittaker model. Multiplicity-one also holds for SL(2), but not for SL(n) for n > 2 (Blasius 1994).

Editorial summary

“Multiplicity-one theorem” enters the record as concerns the representation theory of an adelic reductive algebraic group. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Multiplicity-one, theorem and Concerns can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1970, 1979, 1974, 1994—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Multiplicity-one, theorem and Concerns.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Multiplicity-one theorem” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Multiplicity-one, theorem and Concerns provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6935007. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1970, 1979, 1974 and 1994.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Multiplicity-one theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Multiplicity-one theorem primary sources, Multiplicity-one theorem archive and Multiplicity-one research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Multiplicity-one theorem”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Multiplicity-one theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.