CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Multicenter trial

clinical trial involving multiple clinical research centers

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2024
Entity authorityQ6934595
Source-derived summary

A multicenter research trial is a clinical trial that involves more than one independent medical institutions in enrolling and following trial participants. In multicenter trials the participant institutions follow a common treatment protocol and follow the same data collection guidelines, and there is a single

coordinating center that receives, processes and analyzes study data.

Benefits

An important benefit of multicenter trials is that they permit the enrollment of a larger number of participants at a faster rate, in comparison to a single-center trial, putting to use the sources of multiple institutions. This is crucial when the anticipated benefit from a treatment will be relatively small, or an expected outcome is likely to be uncommon, making a larger sample size necessary. Therefore, studies on preventive measures and therapies tend to be designed as multicenter trials. In studying novel pharmaceuticals, Phase III trials, which compare the new treatment to an established one, are usually multicenter ones. In contrast, Phase I trials, which test potential toxicity of the treatment, and Phase II trials, which establish some preliminary efficacy of the tested treatment, are usually single-center trials, as they require fewer participants.

The benefits of multicenter trials also include the potential for a more heterogenous sample of participants, from different geographic locations and a wider range of population groups, treated from physicians of different backgrounds, and the ability to compare results among centers, all of which increase the generalizability of the study. In many cases, efficacy will vary significantly between population groups with different genetic, environmental, and ethnic or cultural backgrounds ("demographic" factors); multicenter trials are better at evaluating these factors, by giving the opportunity for more subgroup analyses. Heterogeneity in the sample means that the findings will be more generalizable.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Multicenter trial” as clinical trial involving multiple clinical research centers. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 287-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Multicenter, trial and clinical can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as clinical trial involving multiple clinical research centers. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6934595. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Multicenter trial”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Multicenter trial primary sources, Multicenter trial archive and Multicenter research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Multicenter trial”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Multicenter trial” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.