CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Miss Sixty

Italian fashion brand

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ241295
Source-derived summary

Miss Sixty (stylized as MISS SIXTY or MISS 60) is an Italian fashion brand specializing in denim ready-to-wear and fashion accessories.

History

Wicky Hassan founded Miss Sixty in 1991.

In 2000, they launched their own line of footwear, followed by eyewear in 2002 and children's clothing in 2004.

In 2010, Miss Sixty closed half of their 20 remaining stores in the US following the closure of two stores the previous year.

In 2012, it was acquired by a Chinese company Trendy International Group.

Trendy International

Trendy International is a Chinese fashion house founded in 1999, owns domestic women's brands Ochirly and Five Plus as well as male casualwear line Trendiano. The Chinese fashion group is present in more than 290 cities around the world and operates more than 3,000 shops, according to its website. In 2015, Trendy International set up a joint venture with U.K. clothing chain SuperGroup Plc to expand the Superdry brand in China.

Editorial summary

“Miss Sixty” enters the record as italian fashion brand. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Miss, Sixty and Italian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991, 2000, 2002, 2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Miss, Sixty and Italian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Miss Sixty” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Miss, Sixty and Italian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q241295. The first chronological checks are 1991, 2000, 2002 and 2004.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Miss Sixty”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Miss Sixty primary sources, Miss Sixty archive and Miss research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Miss Sixty”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Miss Sixty” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.