CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mouzi Lihuolun

Chinese Buddhist apologetic work in the form of a dialogue between Mouzi and an unnamed Chinese critic questioning Buddhism, who accepts Buddhism by the end

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ10788077 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Mouzi Lihuolun (simplified Chinese: 牟子理惑论; traditional Chinese: 牟子理惑論; pinyin: Móuzǐ lǐhuòlùn; Wade–Giles: Mou-tzu Li-huo-lün; lit. 'Master Mou's Treatise Settling Doubts') is a classic Chinese Buddhist text. It comprises a purportedly autobiographical preface by Master Mou, a late 2nd-century Confucian scholar-official who converted to Buddhism, and an imaginary dialogue of questions and answers about Buddhist practices.

Title

The Mouzi lihuolun is known under several names, including the abbreviated title Mouzi.

Mouzi compounds the uncommon Chinese surname Mou 牟 "seek; obtain" with the suffix -zi 子 "Master" (compare Laozi). The Japanese title Bōshi riwakuron 牟氏理惑論 (Chinese Moushi lihuolun) replaces shi (zi) "Master" with shi (shi) 氏 "Mister; a certain person."

Lihuolun combines li 理 "manage; put in order; acknowledge"; huo 惑 "confusion; delusion; doubt; suspicion"; and lun 論 "discourse; opinion; dissertation; essay."

According to Yu Jiaxi 余嘉錫, the original title Mouzi jihuolun 牟子治惑論 – with zhi 治 "rule; research; manage; cure; eliminate" instead of li – was changed to avoid the naming taboo on Emperor Gaozong of Tang's personal name Zhi 治.

English translations of Mouzi lihuolun include:

"Mou-tzu on the Settling of Doubts"

"Mou-tzu's Treatise on the Removal of Doubt" or "…Elimination of Delusion"

"Master Mou’s Treatise for the Removal of Doubts"

"Mouzi's Correction of Errors"

Some renditions of shortened Lihuolun are:

"Disposing of Error"

"Dispelling Doubts"

"The Removal of Doubts"

Content

The received Mouzi Lihuolun text contains a supposedly autobiographical Introduction, thirty-seven articles of Dialogue between Mouzi and an unnamed Chinese critic (or critics) questioning Buddhist practices, and a Postscript in which the critic converts to Buddhism.

The Introduction identifies the author as an Eastern Han dynasty Confucian scholar who is not mentioned in any Han-era historical records. (Later editions give the name of Mou Rong 牟融. Compare the Tang dynasty scholar also named Mou Rong 牟融.) After the death of Emperor Ling of Han in 189 CE, scholars, especially specialists of immortality fled the chaotic Yellow Turban Rebellion and moved to the extreme south of the empire, where Mouzi argued with them.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Mouzi Lihuolun” as chinese Buddhist apologetic work in the form of a dialogue between Mouzi and an unnamed Chinese critic questioning Buddhism, who accepts Buddhism by the end. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 334-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Mouzi, Lihuolun and Chinese can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as chinese Buddhist apologetic work in the form of a dialogue between Mouzi and an unnamed Chinese critic questioning Buddhism, who accepts Buddhism by the end. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10788077. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mouzi Lihuolun”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mouzi Lihuolun primary sources, Mouzi Lihuolun archive and Mouzi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mouzi Lihuolun”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mouzi Lihuolun” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.