CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Motoric cognitive risk

syndrome implying high risk of dementia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ120023025
Source-derived summary

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a pre-dementia syndrome characterised by slow gait and subjective cognitive complaints in individuals without dementia or mobility disability.

The concept was introduced in 2013 as a clinical construct integrating motor and cognitive markers of dementia risk.

MCR can be assessed without formal neuropsychological testing or neuroimaging and has been proposed as a simple clinical tool for identifying individuals at elevated risk of dementia in community and clinical settings.

Diagnostic criteria

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome is typically defined by four criteria:

subjective cognitive complaint

objectively measured slow gait speed

absence of dementia

absence of mobility disability.

Slow gait speed is generally operationalised as walking speed at least one standard deviation below age- and sex-specific population norms.

The syndrome combines two clinical features independently associated with dementia risk: gait slowing and subjective cognitive decline.

Epidemiology

Motoric cognitive risk syndrome is relatively common among older adults. A pooled analysis of international cohort studies including more than 26,000 participants estimated a prevalence of approximately 9–10% among community-dwelling older adults.

Population-based studies have investigated the prevalence and determinants of MCR in specific cohorts. Research in community-dwelling older adults in Scotland reported prevalence estimates and identified demographic and health-related predictors of the syndrome.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Motoric cognitive risk” as syndrome implying high risk of dementia. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Motoric, cognitive and risk can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as syndrome implying high risk of dementia. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120023025. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Motoric cognitive risk”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Motoric cognitive risk primary sources, Motoric cognitive risk archive and Motoric research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Motoric cognitive risk”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Motoric cognitive risk” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.