CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Moses Hoge

American theologian

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ18206483
Source-derived summary

Moses Hoge (February 15, 1752 – July 5, 1820) was a Presbyterian minister as well as an educator and abolitionist. He served as the sixth President of Hampden–Sydney College.

Early life

Moses Hoge was born in Cedar Grove, Virginia, to James and Nancy Hoge (née Griffiths) in 1752.

Career

Hoge prepared for the ministry under the traditional apprentice-style system. He had been pastor of the Presbyterian Church of Shepherdstown, Virginia (now West Virginia), for twenty years and was famous as a preacher, theological teacher, and tract-writer when he was elected President of Hampden–Sydney College in June 1807. From the start, Hoge's main interest was in training ministers, and his efforts laid the groundwork for the establishment of what became Union Theological Seminary (now Union Presbyterian Seminary) at the south end of the college campus. Princeton gave both Hoge and former Hampden–Sydney president Archibald Alexander Doctorate of Divinity (D.D.) degrees in 1810.

In 1820, after attending the American Bible Society convention in New York, Hoge attended the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia. During his trip, Hoge visited Princeton to see Samuel Stanhope Smith, the first president of Hampden–Sydney, whose preaching had helped lead him to the ministry over forty years earlier. Hoge died on July 5 during his visit to Philadelphia.

Editorial summary

“Moses Hoge” enters the record as american theologian. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Moses, Hoge and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1752, 1820, 1807, 1810—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1752-02-15, 1752-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Moses, Hoge and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Moses Hoge” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Moses, Hoge and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18206483. VIAF identifies the subject as 63869327. The Library of Congress control number is nr92007383. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1752, 1820, 1807 and 1810.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Moses Hoge”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Moses Hoge primary sources, Moses Hoge archive and Moses research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Moses Hoge”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Moses Hoge” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.