CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Morrison-Mott House

Statesville, NC, listed on the NRHP in North Carolina

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ20745478
Source-derived summary

Morrison-Mott House is a historic home located at Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The house was built about 1904–1905, and is a two-story, three-bay, Classical Revival style frame dwelling. It features a two-story, center bay portico, one-story Ionic order wraparound porch, and porte-cochère.

It was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1980.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Morrison-Mott House” is statesville, NC, listed on the NRHP in North Carolina. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Morrison-Mott, House and Statesville, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1904, 1905, 1980—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Morrison-Mott, House and Statesville is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “statesville, NC, listed on the NRHP in North Carolina” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q20745478. Authority coordinates are 35.789, -80.890. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1904, 1905 and 1980.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Morrison-Mott House”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Morrison-Mott House primary sources, Morrison-Mott House archive and Morrison-Mott research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Morrison-Mott House”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Morrison-Mott House” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.