CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

William Morier

(1790-1864)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 24, 2024
Entity authorityQ20878180 ↗
Source-derived summary

Admiral William Morier (25 September 1790 – 29 July 1864) was a British naval officer.

Early life

He was born at Smyrna on 25 September 1790, the fourth son of Isaac Morier, British consul-general at Constantinople. He was educated at Harrow School.

Career

Morier was an officer in the British Navy.

Personal life

He married Frances Lee "Fanny" Bevan, daughter of the banker, David Bevan.

Death

He died at Eastbourne on 29 July 1864.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “William Morier” as (1790-1864). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1790, 1864—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1790-09-25. The account is most persuasive where William, Morier and 1790-1864 can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as (1790-1864). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 24, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q20878180. VIAF identifies the subject as 54500758. The Library of Congress control number is nr90024802. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1790 and 1864.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “William Morier”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow William Morier primary sources, William Morier archive and William research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “William Morier”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “William Morier” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.