CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Moreana

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ15710010
Source-derived summary

Moreana is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal covering research about Thomas More and his milieu and writings, as well as relevant broader questions of 16th-century history, literature and culture. It is published by Edinburgh University Press on behalf of Amici Thomae Mori (English: Society of Friends of Thomas More), with Travis Curtright (Ave Maria University) as editor-in-chief.

History

The journal was established in 1963 under the auspices of Amici Thomae Mori, which had been founded in Brussels the previous year. The editor-in-chief for the first twenty-five years was Germain Marc'hadour (Université Catholique de l'Ouest). He was succeeded by Marie-Claire Phélippeau (Lycée Joffre).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Moreana” is academic journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Moreana, academic and journal, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1963—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1963-01-01. For this dossier, Moreana, academic and journal is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “academic journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15710010. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1963.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Moreana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Moreana primary sources, Moreana archive and Moreana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Moreana”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Moreana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.