CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Morava, Kočevje

human settlement in Slovenia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ279244 ↗
Source-derived summary

Morava (pronounced [mɔˈɾaːʋa]; German: Mrauen) is a village in the Municipality of Kočevje in southern Slovenia. It was a village settled by Gottschee Germans. During the Second World War its original population was expelled. The area is part of the traditional region of Lower Carniola and is now included in the Southeast Slovenia Statistical Region. It includes the former hamlet of Mošenik (German: Moschelnik).

Name

Morava was attested in written records in 1498 as Hemoraw. It is believed to be derived from the archaic Slovene common noun *morava '(wet) meadow'. Locally, the village is known as Omrava. The village was known as Mrauen in German in the past.

Church

The local church, dedicated to the Holy Trinity, was a Late Gothic building.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Morava, Kočevje” is human settlement in Slovenia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Morava, Kočevje and human, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1498—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Morava, Kočevje and human is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “human settlement in Slovenia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q279244. The first chronological checks are 1498.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Morava, Kočevje”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Morava, Kočevje primary sources, Morava, Kočevje archive and Morava research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Morava, Kočevje”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Morava, Kočevje” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.