Moose sickness
neurological disease of moose

Moose sickness (also called moose disease, moose circling disease) is a neurological condition seen in the northern mixed-wood forests of central and eastern North America where moose distribution overlaps with that of white-tailed deer. The disease is characterized by an unsteady gait, stumbling, head held to one side, circling, staying in one location, and in severe cases, being unable to get up.
The cause of the disease was discovered by Prof. Roy Anderson, University of Guelph, to be the meningeal worm, Parelaphostrongylus tenuis, of white-tailed deer, a host that is unaffected by this nematode parasite. The worm's life cycle is complex. To get the disease, a moose must eat the parasite's intermediate host, terrestrial snails or slugs, that have contacted deer feces containing larvae. Moose ingest these accidentally along with ground or low vegetation.
The severity of the disease in individual animals depends on dose, age at infection, and previous experience with the parasite. Younger animals are thought to be most susceptible. Experimentally, neurologic signs exhibited by moose given fewer than 5 infective larvae can resolve, and previously infected animals may have some resistance to subsequent exposure.
“Moose sickness” enters the record as neurological disease of moose. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Moose, sickness and neurological can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Moose sickness” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Moose, sickness and neurological provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6908671. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Moose sickness”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Moose sickness primary sources, Moose sickness archive and Moose research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Moose sickness”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Moose sickness” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.