CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Montreal Metro

rubber-tired metro system in Montreal, Quebec

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ392377
Source-derived summary

The Montreal Metro (French: Métro de Montréal, pronounced [metʁo də mɔ̃ʁeal]) is a rubber-tired underground rapid transit system serving Greater Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The metro, operated by the Société de transport de Montréal (STM), was inaugurated on October 14, 1966, during the tenure of Mayor Jean Drapeau.

Since its opening, with 22 stations on two lines, it has expanded to 68 stations on four lines, totalling 69.2 kilometres (43.0 mi) in length. It serves the north, east and centre of the Island of Montreal, with connections to Longueuil via the Yellow Line (Line 4), and Laval via the Orange Line (Line 2).

The Montreal Metro is Canada's second busiest rapid transit system in terms of daily ridership, delivering an average of 1,003,800 daily unlinked passenger trips per weekday as of the second quarter of 2026. It is North America's fourth busiest rapid transit system, behind the New York City Subway, Mexico City Metro and Toronto subway. In 2025, 311,929,200 trips on the Metro were completed. It is one of two rapid transit systems in Montreal, alongside the Réseau express métropolitain (REM).

History

Urban transit began in Montreal in 1861 when a line of horse-drawn cars started to operate on Craig (now St-Antoine) and Notre-Dame streets. Eventually, as the city grew, a comprehensive network of streetcar lines provided service in most of the city.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Montreal Metro” as rubber-tired metro system in Montreal, Quebec. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Montreal, Metro and rubber-tired.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1966, 2026, 2025, 1861—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Montreal, Metro and rubber-tired providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Montreal Metro”, the useful work is to connect “rubber-tired metro system in Montreal, Quebec” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q392377. The first chronological checks are 1966, 2026, 2025 and 1861.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Montreal Metro”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Montreal Metro primary sources, Montreal Metro archive and Montreal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Montreal Metro”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Montreal Metro” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.