CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Montipora grisea

species of cnidarian

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3948842
Source-derived summary

Montipora grisea is a small polyped stony coral in the family Acroporidae.

Description

It is an encrusting species considered to be massively sized, with "thick unifacial plates." It is usually dark brown or green in color, but also appears in shades of blue or pink. These corals have small bumps, known as thecal papillae, that are fused together around the corallite. They also have a coenosteum papillae that is present.

Distribution & habitat

Montipora grisea has a vast range, found within the reefs of forty-five countries and territories throughout the Indian and Pacific oceans. It exists at depths of 3 to 20 metres (10 to 70 ft), with a preference for "shallow, tropical reef environments on upper reef slopes."

Despite being considered a common species with a presently large population, Montipora grisea faces an array of threats. It is moderately susceptible to bleaching, though notably less so than Acropora corals. Other threats include predation from the crown-of-thorns starfish, harvesting for the aquarium trade, climate change and ocean acidification.

Reproduction and Development

These corals can be hermaphroditic or gonochoric. Their zygote produces planktonic planula larvae.

Editorial summary

“Montipora grisea” enters the record as species of cnidarian. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Montipora, grisea and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 184-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Montipora, grisea and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Montipora grisea” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Montipora, grisea and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3948842. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Montipora grisea”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Montipora grisea primary sources, Montipora grisea archive and Montipora research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Montipora grisea”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Montipora grisea” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.