CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Monthly Review

Socialist magazine published monthly in New York City

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ1946330
Source-derived summary

The Monthly Review is an independent socialist magazine published monthly in New York City. Founded in 1949, it is the longest continuously published socialist magazine in the U.S. From its beginning, Monthly Review was characterized as having "a nondoctrinaire approach to socialism" that became increasingly critical of the Soviet Union. The magazine was most closely linked to Third World socialism and national liberation struggles, and consequently saw its popularity grow among the New Left during the Vietnam War.

History

Establishment

Following the failure of Progressive Party candidate Henry A. Wallace in the 1948 presidential election, two former Wallace supporters, and ex-Harvard colleagues, met on a New Hampshire farm where one of them was living. The two men were literary scholar and Christian socialist F. O. "Matty" Matthiessen and Marxist economist Paul Sweezy. Matthiessen, who came into an inheritance after his father died in a car accident in California, had no pressing need for the inheritance money. He offered Sweezy to underwrite "that magazine [Sweezy] and Leo Huberman were always talking about" by committing the sum of $5,000 per year for three years.

While Matthiessen was the angel investor of the new publication, the editorial responsibilities were handled by Sweezy and his friend Leo Huberman. The latter was a New York University-educated author of left-wing books and pamphlets during the 1930s and '40s. He worked full-time on the Monthly Review from its establishment until his death of a heart attack in 1968.

Editorial summary

“Monthly Review” enters the record as socialist magazine published monthly in New York City. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Monthly, Review and Socialist can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949, 1948, 1968—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Monthly, Review and Socialist.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Monthly Review” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Monthly, Review and Socialist provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1946330. The first chronological checks are 1949, 1948 and 1968.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monthly Review”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monthly Review primary sources, Monthly Review archive and Monthly research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monthly Review”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Monthly Review” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.