Eyprepocprifas
genus of grasshoppers

Eyprepocprifas is a genus of grasshoppers in the subfamily Eyprepocnemidinae with the sole species, Monte Gordo grasshopper (Eyprepocprifas insularis) known only from São Nicolau in the Cape Verde Islands.
It was formally described from a single specimen in 1980, declared extinct in 1996, and rediscovered in 2025.
Description
Eyprepocprifas insularis is a small-sized grasshopper, with females growing to an average length of 3.1 cm (1.22 in), while males are smaller, averaging in at around 1.9 cm (0.75 in). Both males and females vary in coloration. The general color is beige-brown. The dorsal part of the head has a dark longitudinal band that runs through the thorax. The hind tibia and hind tarsus is reddish, while the antennae, abdomen, tegmen, lateral thorax, and hind femur are dark brown.
Distribution and habitat
Eyprepocprifas insularis is endemic to Monte Gordo Natural Park in São Nicolau, Cape Verde. It is restricted to 650-1100 m. above sea level.
“Eyprepocprifas” enters the record as genus of grasshoppers. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Eyprepocprifas, genus and grasshoppers can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Eyprepocprifas” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Eyprepocprifas, genus and grasshoppers provides the most credible route into that argument.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14627563. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1980, 1996, 2025 and 1100.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Eyprepocprifas”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Eyprepocprifas primary sources, Eyprepocprifas archive and Eyprepocprifas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eyprepocprifas”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Eyprepocprifas” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.