CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Monotone likelihood ratio

Statistical property

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 18, 2024
Entity authorityQ6902029 ↗
Source-derived summary

In statistics, the monotone likelihood ratio property is a property of the ratio of two probability density functions (PDFs). Formally, distributions

f

(

x

)

{\displaystyle \ f(x)\ }

and

g

(

x

)

{\displaystyle \ g(x)\ }

bear the property if

for every

x

2

>

x

1

,

f

(

x

2

)

g

(

x

2

)

≥

f

(

x

1

)

g

(

x

1

)

{\displaystyle \ {\text{for every }}x_{2}>x_{1},\quad {\frac {f(x_{2})}{\ g(x_{2})\ }}\geq {\frac {f(x_{1})}{\ g(x_{1})\ }}\ }

that is, if the ratio is nondecreasing in the argument

x

{\displaystyle x}

.

If the functions are first-differentiable, the property may sometimes be stated

∂

∂

x

(

f

(

x

)

g

(

x

)

)

≥

0

{\displaystyle {\frac {\ \partial }{\ \partial x}}\left({\frac {f(x)}{\ g(x)\ }}\right)\geq 0\ }

For two distributions that satisfy the definition with respect to some argument

x

,

{\displaystyle \ x\ ,}

we say they "have the MLRP in

x

.

{\displaystyle \ x~.}

" For a family of distributions that all satisfy the definition with respect to some statistic

T

(

X

)

,

{\displaystyle \ T(X)\ ,}

we say they "have the MLR in

T

(

X

)

.

{\displaystyle \ T(X)~.}

"

Intuition

The MLRP is used to represent a data-generating process that enjoys a straightforward relationship between the magnitude of some observed variable and the distribution it draws from. If

f

(

x

)

{\displaystyle \ f(x)\ }

satisfies the MLRP with respect to

g

(

x

)

{\displaystyle \ g(x)\ }

, the higher the observed value

x

{\displaystyle \ x\ }

, the more likely it was drawn from distribution

f

{\displaystyle \ f\ }

rather than

g

.

{\displaystyle \ g~.}

As usual for monotonic relationships, the likelihood ratio's monotonicity comes in handy in statistics, particularly when using maximum-likelihood estimation. Also, distribution families with MLR have a number of well-behaved stochastic properties, such as first-order stochastic dominance and increasing hazard ratios. Unfortunately, as is also usual, the strength of this assumption comes at the price of realism. Many processes in the world do not exhibit a monotonic correspondence between input and output.

Editorial summary

“Monotone likelihood ratio” enters the record as statistical property. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Monotone, likelihood and ratio can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 362-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Monotone, likelihood and ratio.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Monotone likelihood ratio” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Monotone, likelihood and ratio provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 18, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q6902029. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monotone likelihood ratio”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monotone likelihood ratio primary sources, Monotone likelihood ratio archive and Monotone research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monotone likelihood ratio”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Monotone likelihood ratio” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.