CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Monohordia Union

union of Kushtia Sadar upazila

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ13152114 ↗
Source-derived summary

Monohordia Union (Bengali: মনোহরদিয়া ইউনিয়ন) is a union parishad of Kushtia Sadar Upazila, in Kushtia District, Khulna Division of Bangladesh. The union has an area of 21.19 square kilometres (8.18 sq mi) and as of 2001 had a population of 23,499. There are 11 villages and 2 mouzas in the union.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Monohordia Union” is union of Kushtia Sadar upazila. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Monohordia, Union and union, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Monohordia, Union and union is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “union of Kushtia Sadar upazila” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13152114. Authority coordinates are 23.729, 89.047. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Monohordia Union”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Monohordia Union primary sources, Monohordia Union archive and Monohordia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monohordia Union”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Monohordia Union” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.