Monin–Obukhov length
variable in atmospheric physics

The Obukhov length is used to describe the effects of buoyancy on turbulent flows, particularly in the lower tenth of the atmospheric boundary layer. It was first defined by Alexander Obukhov in 1946. It is also known as the Monin–Obukhov length because of its important role in the similarity theory developed by Monin and Obukhov. A simple definition of the Monin-Obukhov length is that height at which turbulence is generated more by buoyancy than by wind shear.
The Obukhov length is defined by
L
=
−
u
∗
3
θ
¯
v
k
g
(
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
)
s
{\displaystyle L=-{\frac {u_{*}^{3}{\bar {\theta }}_{v}}{kg({\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}})_{s}}}\ }
where
u
∗
{\displaystyle u_{*}}
is the frictional velocity,
θ
¯
v
{\displaystyle {\bar {\theta }}_{v}}
is the mean virtual potential temperature,
(
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
)
s
{\displaystyle ({\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}})_{s}}
is the surface virtual potential temperature flux, k is the von Kármán constant. If not known, the virtual potential temperature flux can be approximated with:
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
=
w
′
θ
′
¯
(
1
+
0.61
r
¯
)
+
0.61
θ
¯
w
′
r
′
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}}={\overline {w^{'}\theta ^{'}}}(1+0.61{\overline {r}})+0.61{\overline {\theta }}\;{\overline {w^{'}r^{'}}}}
where
θ
{\displaystyle \theta }
is potential temperature, and
r
{\displaystyle r}
is mixing ratio.
By this definition,
L
{\displaystyle L}
is usually negative in the daytime since
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}}}
is typically positive during the daytime over land, positive at night when
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}}}
is typically negative, and becomes infinite at dawn and dusk when
w
′
θ
v
′
¯
{\displaystyle {\overline {w^{'}\theta _{v}^{'}}}}
passes through zero.
A physical interpretation of
L
{\displaystyle L}
is given by the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. During the day
−
L
{\displaystyle -L}
is the height at which the buoyant production of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) is equal to that produced by the shearing action of the wind (shear production of TKE).
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Monin–Obukhov length” as variable in atmospheric physics. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as variable in atmospheric physics. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3110303. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1946.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Monin–Obukhov length”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Monin–Obukhov length primary sources, Monin–Obukhov length archive and Monin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Monin–Obukhov length”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Monin–Obukhov length” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.