CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Money Weekly

weekly business magazine in China

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ107610521 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Money Weekly (simplified Chinese: 理财周刊; traditional Chinese: 理財週刊; pinyin: Lǐcái zhōukān) is a Chinese investment and financial management magazine established on 18 March 2001 and headquartered in Shanghai. It is the first financial management magazine catering to investors in Mainland China.

Presented by Shanghai Johnson Group and Shanghai Century Publishing Group, Money Weekly is published every Monday in Shanghai and is distributed throughout China.

Money Weekly annually hosts financial management fairs in Shanghai and surrounding cities.

Editorial summary

“Money Weekly” enters the record as weekly business magazine in China. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Money, Weekly and weekly can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Money, Weekly and weekly.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Money Weekly” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Money, Weekly and weekly provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q107610521. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Money Weekly”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Money Weekly primary sources, Money Weekly archive and Money research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Money Weekly”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Money Weekly” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.