CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Moneta (spider)

genus of arachnids

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ3320604 ↗
Source-derived summary

Moneta is a genus of comb-footed spiders that was first described by Octavius Pickard-Cambridge in 1871.

Editorial summary

“Moneta (spider)” enters the record as genus of arachnids. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Moneta, spider and genus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1871—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Moneta, spider and genus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Moneta (spider)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Moneta, spider and genus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3320604. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1871.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Moneta (spider)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Moneta (spider) primary sources, Moneta (spider) archive and Moneta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Moneta (spider)”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Moneta (spider)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.